What’s the Natter with You
I’m just a plainspoken Colorado criminal defense lawyer, but the way I see it…
Across the pond, to natter means to talk casually, especially on unimportant matters. It can also be a noun, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, as in “I could do with a drink and a natter.”
We could all use a drink these days, but thanks to a senior lecturer in criminal justice in Bristol (the one in the wild, wild west of England), we could all use a natter or two as well.
Dr. Edward Johnston, who teaches at the University of the West of England, last week launched the perfect podcast for when you’re quarantined home staring at the floor and wondering whether you’ll ever see the inside of a courtroom again. It’s called “Criminal Justice Natters,” but the title is a bit of a lie, because he plans to talk about, every couple of weeks, some fairly important issues of criminal justice, criminal procedure, and fair trial rights. And if you’re tired of looking at your floor, there’s also a YouTube version.
In the first natter, Dr. Johnston talks with a young man whose ex-girlfriend falsely accused him of rape a few months into his freshman year (they call them freshers over there) studying criminology and criminal psychology. Over the next two years it became his life course, nearly failed by persistent thoughts of suicide.
He was innocent, but people treated him as though he was guilty. That’s how he puts it to Dr. Johnston: he felt he was presumed guilty, then there would be a trial. So he couldn’t wait for trial, but he had to — two years.
For two years, evidence that would free him was withheld from his lawyer — the police denied its very existence. The night before trial, police dumped two thousand four hundred eighteen pages of transcript, of the contents of nearly sixty thousand text messages downloaded from the accuser’s phone, on the lawyer. The lawyer did her job, heroically, and found among the tens of thousands of messages a few that would clear her client. One of them, written to a friend of the accuser days after the alleged rape, described the sex with the young man: “It wasn’t against my will or anything.”
The case was dismissed. The police offered apology; the judge complete exoneration.
This first natter is a painful episode to watch, to realize how much of this young man’s life was, and perhaps remains, derailed. He seems still perplexed by what happened. At one point Dr. Johnston apologizes for the difficulty of some of his questions.
The young man smiles, ruefully. “I’m used to them.”